CVE – Search Results – File Archive:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The table s below shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore.

The different Modes of Introduction provide information about how and when this weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which introduction may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the given phase. The table below specifies different individual consequences associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness.

The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact. While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:.

The buffer size is fixed, but there is no guarantee the string in argv[1] will not exceed this size and cause an overflow. This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer. This function allocates a buffer of 64 bytes to store the hostname, however there is no guarantee that the hostname will not be larger than 64 bytes. If an attacker specifies an address which resolves to a very large hostname, then we may overwrite sensitive data or even relinquish control flow to the attacker.

Run or compile the software using features or extensions that automatically provide a protection mechanism that mitigates or eliminates buffer overflows. For example, certain compilers and extensions provide automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are built into the compiled code.

CWE is sponsored by the U. CWE Glossary Definition. Weakness ID: Status: Draft. Presentation Filter:. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack i.

Alternate Terms. Stack Overflow: “Stack Overflow” is often used to mean the same thing as stack-based buffer overflow, however it is also used on occasion to mean stack exhaustion, usually a result from an excessively recursive function call.

Due to the ambiguity of the term, use of stack overflow to describe either circumstance is discouraged. Relevant to the view “Research Concepts” CWE Nature Type ID Name ChildOf Base – a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention.

Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource. Background Details. There are generally several security-critical data on an execution stack that can lead to arbitrary code execution. The most prominent is the stored return address, the memory address at which execution should continue once the current function is finished executing.

The attacker can overwrite this value with some memory address to which the attacker also has write access, into which they place arbitrary code to be run with the full privileges of the vulnerable program. Alternately, the attacker can supply the address of an important call, for instance the POSIX system call, leaving arguments to the call on the stack. This is often called a return into libc exploit, since the attacker generally forces the program to jump at return time into an interesting routine in the C standard library libc.

Other important data commonly on the stack include the stack pointer and frame pointer, two values that indicate offsets for computing memory addresses.

Modifying those values can often be leveraged into a “write-what-where” condition. Modes Of Introduction. Phase Note Architecture and Design Implementation. Applicable Platforms. The listings below show possible areas for which the given weakness could appear. These may be for specific named Languages, Operating Systems, Architectures, Paradigms, Technologies, or a class of such platforms. The platform is listed along with how frequently the given weakness appears for that instance.

Languages C Undetermined Prevalence. Common Consequences. Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop. Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program’s implicit security policy. When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.

Likelihood Of Exploit. Demonstrative Examples. Example 1 While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows: bad code. Example Language: C. Potential Mitigations.

Note: This is not necessarily a complete solution, since these mechanisms can only detect certain types of overflows. In addition, an attack could still cause a denial of service, since the typical response is to exit the application. Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution. Unless this provides automatic bounds checking, it is not a complete solution.

Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors. This is not a complete solution. Weakness Ordinalities. Ordinality Description Primary. This information is often useful in understanding where a weakness fits within the context of external information sources.

Characters and Strings STR. Other Stack-based buffer overflows can instantiate in return address overwrites, stack pointer overwrites or frame pointer overwrites. They can also be considered function pointer overwrites, array indexer overwrites or write-what-where condition, etc.

Taxonomy Mappings. Chapter 5, “Stack Overruns” Page Microsoft Press. Chapter 3, “Nonexecutable Stack”, Page Addison Wesley. Chapter 5, “Protection Mechanisms”, Page Content History. More information is available — Please select a different filter. Page Last Updated: March 15, ID Lookup:. Base – a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention.

Out-of-bounds Write. Technical Impact: Modify Memory; Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Bypass Protection Mechanism Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program’s implicit security policy. Technical Impact: Modify Memory; Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Bypass Protection Mechanism; Other When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.

Phase: Build and Compilation Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening Run or compile the software using features or extensions that automatically provide a protection mechanism that mitigates or eliminates buffer overflows. Effectiveness: Defense in Depth Note: This is not necessarily a complete solution, since these mechanisms can only detect certain types of overflows.

Phase: Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input. Phase: Implementation Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Category – a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. Arrays ARR. Guarantee that storage for strings has sufficient space for character data and the null terminator.

 
 

Corel pdf fusion xps stack buffer overflow vulnerability free download.ICS Advisory (ICSA-15-092-01)

 

Да, панк, – сказала Росио на плохом английском и тотчас снова перешла на испанский.  – Mucha joyeria. Вся в украшениях. В одном ухе странная серьга, кажется, в виде черепа.

 

Corel pdf fusion xps stack buffer overflow vulnerability free download

 

In some cases, the vulnerabilities in the bulletin may not yet have assigned CVSS scores. The division of high, medium, and low severities correspond to the following scores:. Entries may include additional information provided by organizations and efforts sponsored by CISA. This information may include identifying information, values, definitions, and related links. Patch information is provided when available. Please note that some of the information in the bulletin is compiled from external, open-source reports and is not a direct result of CISA analysis.

We recently updated our anonymous product survey ; we’d welcome your feedback. More Bulletins. Original release date: October 07, Last revised: October 29, The division of high, medium, and low severities correspond to the following scores: High : vulnerabilities with a CVSS base score of 7. Please share your thoughts. Apache Struts 2. Baramundi Management Suite 7. Blue Coat ProxySG before 6. Use-after-free vulnerability in Blink, as used in Google Chrome before Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before The Node View Permissions module 7.

Passcode Lock in Apple iOS before 7. Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in multi. Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the image-download process in the fabric-interconnect component in Cisco Unified Computing System UCS allows local users to overwrite or delete arbitrary files via a full pathname in an image header, aka Bug ID CSCtq Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in lazyseo.

The access policy logon page logon. Cross-site scripting XSS vulnerability in the access policy logout page logout. Multiple race conditions in the Web Audio implementation in Blink, as used in Google Chrome before The Window.

Google Chrome before Use-after-free vulnerability in the color-chooser dialog in Google Chrome before Blink, as used in Google Chrome before Multiple buffer overflows in 1 mkque and 2 mkquedev in bos. The DiagnosticsHandler in JGroup 3.

RealtimeKit aka rtkit 0. The LZW decompressor in the gif2tiff tool in libtiff 4. Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in LittleCMS aka lcms or liblcms 1.

The Metaclassy Byword app 2. MongoDB before 2. Integer overflow in kbdint. The qemuAgentCommand function in libvirt before 1. The org. RubyGems before 1. Directory traversal vulnerability in Spring Signage Xibo 1.

Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in 1 Watchguard Log Collector wlcollector. A certain Debian patch for txt2man 1.

Cross-site scripting XSS vulnerability in the administration page in the Flag module 7. The user-password-update command in python-keystoneclient before 0.

Xen 4. The fbld instruction emulation in Xen 3. Zabbix 2.